Peer Review Policy

šŸ†• Peer Review Policy

URBE Journal – A Multidisciplinary Journal follows a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original, and impactful research.


šŸ” Review Model

URBEJournal adopts a Double-Blind Peer Review System:

šŸ†• Reviewer identities are hidden from authors
šŸ†• Author identities are hidden from reviewers
šŸ†• Ensures unbiased and fair evaluation


āš™ļø Peer Review Workflow

Below is the step-by-step review process followed by the journal:

šŸ“ Manuscript Submission
↓
šŸ“‹ Initial Editorial Screening
↓
šŸ” Plagiarism Check
↓
šŸ‘Øā€šŸ« Assignment to Reviewers (2 Experts)
↓
šŸ“‘ Double-Blind Peer Review
↓
šŸ†• Reviewer Comments & Recommendations
↓
āœļø Author Revision (if required)
↓
āœ… Final Editorial Decision
↓
šŸ“¢ Acceptance / Rejection
↓
šŸ—“ļø Publication in Upcoming Issue


šŸ“‹ Initial Screening

šŸ†• Scope and relevance check
šŸ†• Formatting and guideline compliance
šŸ†• Basic quality assessment

Manuscripts failing to meet criteria may be rejected at this stage.


šŸ”Ž Plagiarism Check

šŸ†• All submissions are checked using plagiarism detection tools
šŸ†• Only manuscripts within acceptable similarity limits proceed


šŸ‘Øā€šŸ« Reviewer Assignment

šŸ†• Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two subject experts
šŸ†• Reviewers are selected based on expertise and experience
šŸ†• Conflict of interest is strictly avoided


šŸ“‘ Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:

āœ” Originality and novelty
āœ” Methodological soundness
āœ” Relevance to journal scope
āœ” Clarity and structure
āœ” Contribution to the field


šŸ†• Reviewer Recommendations

Reviewers may recommend:

🟢 Accept
🟔 Minor Revision
🟠 Major Revision
šŸ”“ Reject


āœļø Author Revisions

šŸ†• Authors must address reviewer comments carefully
šŸ†• Revised manuscript should include response to reviewers
šŸ†• Multiple revision rounds may occur if necessary


āœ… Final Decision

The Editor makes the final decision based on:

šŸ†• Reviewer reports
šŸ†• Author revisions
šŸ†• Editorial judgment

Decision outcomes:

āœ” Accepted
āœ” Accepted with minor changes
āœ” Rejected


⚔ Review Timeline

šŸ†• Initial Screening: 1–2 days
šŸ†• Peer Review: 2–3 Days
šŸ†• Final Decision: Within 2–3 Days

(Timeline may vary depending on revisions and reviewer availability.)


šŸ” Confidentiality & Ethics

šŸ†• All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents
šŸ†• Reviewers must not share or use unpublished data
šŸ†• Ethical guidelines are strictly followed


āš ļø Conflict of Interest

šŸ†• Reviewers and editors must disclose any conflicts
šŸ†• Biased reviews are not tolerated


šŸ“¢ Transparency & Quality

URBE Journal ensures:

šŸ†• Fair and unbiased review process
šŸ†• High academic standards
šŸ†• Continuous improvement in editorial practices


šŸ“© Contact

For queries related to peer review:

šŸ“§ Submiturbejournal@gmail.com